Talk:Shadow Stinkers: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Emerald141 (talk | contribs) (I hate spambots.) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
It isn't really ''official''. Even then I still think that it would be better just to have one page for Shadow Stinkers, and have both types of Shadow Stinker in ''that'' page. [[User:Fuzboto|Fuzboto]] 09:26, 28 June 2011 (CDT) | It isn't really ''official''. Even then I still think that it would be better just to have one page for Shadow Stinkers, and have both types of Shadow Stinker in ''that'' page. [[User:Fuzboto|Fuzboto]] 09:26, 28 June 2011 (CDT) | ||
Well, anything MS says is official since he made the games; however upon second thought I guess it would make it a little more cumbersome to have two pages. I agree now, we should just keep it as one. [[User:Emerald141|Emerald141]] 09:53, 28 June 2011 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:01, 6 July 2011
Split into two articles?
Technically, there are two types of this thing: Shadow Stinkers and Fire Stinkers. I was wondering whether it would be a good idea to have a separate article for each. Emerald141 21:06, 24 June 2011 (CDT)
Technically, there are two types of Shadow Stinkers; the red ones and the blue ones (which are both nameless). So I think we should just have one article for both types of Shadow Stinkers; Shadow Stinkers. Fuzboto 07:11, 27 June 2011 (CDT)
MS actually named them at the bottom of this page: [1]. Emerald141 09:45, 27 June 2011 (CDT)
It isn't really official. Even then I still think that it would be better just to have one page for Shadow Stinkers, and have both types of Shadow Stinker in that page. Fuzboto 09:26, 28 June 2011 (CDT)
Well, anything MS says is official since he made the games; however upon second thought I guess it would make it a little more cumbersome to have two pages. I agree now, we should just keep it as one. Emerald141 09:53, 28 June 2011 (CDT)