Talk:Wonderland Discussion Board: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Tyteen4a03 (talk | contribs) |
Emerald141 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I was wondering if it would be a good idea to post brief descriptions of active users on this page. Would that be okay, or would it be pointless/potentially insulting? [[User:Emerald141|Emerald141]] 15:28, 5 June 2011 (CDT) | I was wondering if it would be a good idea to post brief descriptions of active users on this page. Would that be okay, or would it be pointless/potentially insulting? [[User:Emerald141|Emerald141]] 15:28, 5 June 2011 (CDT) | ||
:These stuff should be put in their own user pages. I was thinking of a separate page, but well... maybe later. [[User:Tyteen4a03|Tyteen4a03]] 18:22, 14 June 2011 (CDT) | :These stuff should be put in their own user pages. I was thinking of a separate page, but well... maybe later. [[User:Tyteen4a03|Tyteen4a03]] 18:22, 14 June 2011 (CDT) | ||
:Well, if we do put some descriptions for users on the board, I was thinking dividing them into four categories: active, inactive, banned/suspended, and deceased. Obviously most of the 'inactive' users don't have pages, and neither does the one deceased user [:(] so that's why I thought this section. [[User:Emerald141|Emerald141]] 13:28, 23 June 2011 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:28, 23 June 2011
Active user descriptions?
I was wondering if it would be a good idea to post brief descriptions of active users on this page. Would that be okay, or would it be pointless/potentially insulting? Emerald141 15:28, 5 June 2011 (CDT)
- These stuff should be put in their own user pages. I was thinking of a separate page, but well... maybe later. Tyteen4a03 18:22, 14 June 2011 (CDT)
- Well, if we do put some descriptions for users on the board, I was thinking dividing them into four categories: active, inactive, banned/suspended, and deceased. Obviously most of the 'inactive' users don't have pages, and neither does the one deceased user [:(] so that's why I thought this section. Emerald141 13:28, 23 June 2011 (CDT)